What was your meta-cognitive process? The article is dense in content - so how did YOU make SENSE of it? What is she trying to teach? Facts? Processes? Concepts? Principles?If you had to teach this same reading content to a high schooler, what other media would you use to break it into mind-sized chunks or to make it easier to process according to how you think? Sensemaking, sounds straightforward. The name is misleading. I saw a person standing in front of a pit (a literal barrier), the person had built a bridge of knowledge over the pit, so that the person could get to their goal. This made a little bit more sense to me. From my very surface level understanding of the text I took away 3 big ideas (even though I know there are more).
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gUv76QyBn0n1ZRLEFEBkpXGG5BwFtn9ZHf-PMOqjM6Q/edit?usp=sharing ACTION RESEARCH TIMELINE
2 Comments
Rafael Garcia Avila
2/17/2019 10:35:04 pm
Thank you Catie,
Reply
Tess Giner
2/19/2019 11:00:46 pm
I re-read it several times because I wanted to make a connection to our research study. I was very frustrated the first time I read it because I so badly wanted it to make a connection and I was bogged down by the weird writing style. I wish I had read your blog first! Your three "take-aways" MAKE SENSE!
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Catie GoldsteinInnovative Learning Master's Student. Teacher. Napper. Dog Petter. Archives
June 2019
Categories |